Tag Archive for: PR

Creating media magic – the importance of appropriate photographs

/1 Comment/in , , /by

One area I have discovered a lot of businesses will overlook is the way their company is visually represented in the print and online media. And I’m not talking about websites, design or logos – I’m referring to photographs.

It never fails to amaze me how much money companies will spend on improving their online presence, or various other aspects of their business, yet quality photographs of staff and products won’t get a second look.

Many regional newspapers, magazines and online sites will only have one or two photographers. These photographers are often freelance photographers (contract) who will only work at the media outlet part-time.

What this means when you are pitching to media is that the chances of a regional/small media outlet setting up a fresh photograph to go with your story, or product, is pretty slim. This doesn’t mean it won’t happen. It just means you are competing with the thousand or so other stories which also need photographs. Editors need to fill space. They also need to meet a quota of stories and have appropriate photographs to go with them.

If you are on a deadline – your photographer is already booked out – and you have a choice between a story with a photo versus a story with no photo the chances are the story with the photo will win out every time.

Of course saying that, the larger media outlets will always want to own copyright and have their own pictures…

If a company does have images for media a lot of the time these images will be old or outdated. You know the ones – the fresh faced CEO who looks about forty but when you meet them in person they are really sixty and look nothing like their official media photograph?

There is nothing the media hates more than a (pr) company sending them pictures to accompany stories which represent their clients -or products – in a falsified manner. Media outlets don’t want old images or ones which look dodgy and outdated. It reflects on the quality of their publication. Media outlets want a variety of quality images which accurately portray whoever or whatever it is they are writing about.

They also don’t want to print the same thing as all of the other media outlets you’ve sent your story to.

It is crucial your brand aligns with images which accurately represent the business products and which fit the overall brand strategy. If you are going to push products, staff and employees of your business in the media its important to make sure they are presented in a way which fits in with the overall marketing strategy of your business. Social media also needs to be addressed in this regard but that is a whole other topic altogether.

Depending on the size of your business and what is being promoted in the media realistically you should be looking at indulging in professional photography shoots at least once a year. If you can’t hire someone it is still easy to update your media images. All it involves is finding an amateur photographer and allocating time and resources to make it happen.

The best part about professional media shoots is that your company will own all of the images afterwards – you can reuse these images in marketing material, or online, as you choose.

Quality photographs are an excellent business tool and will always help to enhance your media coverage.

Claire Kelly – Media Relations Manager, Ignite PR and Marketing

Navigating the murky waters of professional PR measurement

/2 Comments/in /by

In 2010, we’re utterly obsessed with measurement. This obsession hasn’t been a quantum shift, a grand epiphany, or a light bulb moment, it’s been a slow build, a snowball culminating with the global financial crisis.

Today business owners must be able to produce proof at a moment’s notice to substantiate any spend.

Gone are the ‘good’ old days when a crisp suit, lunch on the agency and the whisper of expensive cologne were enough to reassure clients of campaign success (think Madmen).

Today, we’re pay-per-click, we’re analytics, we’re tangible results, we’re figures, reports and metrics, except of course when it comes to professional public relations. The reason for this is a fundamental lack of any uniform measurement platform for PR and marketing agencies in Australia to use, by which all can be judged.

The fact that such a system remains nonexistent in 2010 almost beggars belief.

The elephant in the room is highlighted all the more by PR agencies who flout this lack of regulation by presenting clients with reports boasting hundreds of thousands, or even millions of dollars worth of positive PR. These often ludicrous figures are reached by a not-so-clever multiplication of AVE figures.

AVE, meaning Advertising Value Equivalent is the closest thing PR and marketing agencies have to adequate measurement tools. AVE is calculated by PR professionals literally sitting down with media clippings, a ruler and a calculator and determining the size of any given media clipping. Based on the size we are able to establish what the equivalent advertising price for the space would be.

But here’s where it gets messy. Some agencies will then add a multiplier to the total value, on the assumption that editorial is more credible than advertising. Many agencies consider 3 times AVE to be acceptable, however some use 5 times AVE or, heaven forbid, even more.

It may be partly due to these measurement disparities that the Public Relations Institute of Australia actually discourages the use of AVE figures and also states in its code of ethics:

‘Members shall refrain from proposing or agreeing that their consultancy fees or other remuneration be contingent entirely on the achievement of specified results’.

However, like it or not, clients are increasingly asking for these figures and agencies which refuse to produce them may be seen as disreputable.

Recently the director of a large Sydney agency told us she was now being asked for AVE figures by clients for the first time, even though the practice has been commonplace in Queensland (at least for our agency) for many years.

So here’s the punch: When two different agencies can deliver the same level of media coverage, but value this coverage wildly differently, how can clients adequately compare ‘apples with apples’ when it comes to PR?

The establishment of a viable evaluation platform for professional public relations and marketing, which is accepted by a majority of service providers and backed by the PRIA, is one of the most vital steps in the maturation of the industry in Australia.

Agencies who consistently deliver strong results for their clients will welcome this new age of measurement and transparency.

Is the audience listening? The compounding value of market research and targeted PR.

/in /by

Last year I began managing the public relations for a new client in the retail franchising sector. Following our first meeting I received an email from the client with their ‘brand strategy kit’ of about 30 pages attached.

Contained in the kit were results of market research, which had allowed the client to glean to following facts about their customer base, among others:

 • Young, suburban, singles couples and families

 • Almost 2 in 3 under 40 years of age

• Children under 12 years of age

• Very regular take away eaters

From this research our client had further categorized their customer demographics into three general categories with specific characteristics assigned to each. I was also provided with research on the current market perception of their brand, a map of their key competitors and a copy of their brand values statement.

After examining the kit, I was struck by how ‘ready’ the company was for PR. They were ready because, as a business, they were able to confidently answer one question:

Who do you want to talk to and why?

In my experience, unsuccessful PR, from an ROI point of view, is often engaged and executed too early, too late, or too broad.

Too early might occur when a business is only semi operational or in start up phase. The business owner may be desperate to get some exposure but isn’t quite sure who the market for the product actually is. In the long term, this kind of ‘ready, fire, aim’ approach to marketing and PR can do a brand more harm than good.

Too late is often either when a product is bad and this has affected sales, or when a brand’s reputation is damaged. Damaged reputations can sometimes be mended over time with the help of PR, bad products, however, almost always remain bad products.

Too broad arises when clients don’t think strategically about their communication goals (and do not listen to the advice from their PR agency). Let’s say a client has a new product. It is a niche piece of medical equipment to be sold into hospitals. The client may want a spot on the 6pm news, but is this really the best place for the product to appear? How many of these viewers are potential buyers of the product? Probably less than one percent. The right location for editorial on such a product is respected medical journals, online and print industry media, targeted TV and radio segments and the medical sections of the major papers.

Avoiding the aforementioned pitfalls is made much easier with a strong customer profile to fall back on when in doubt. So before you jump into bed with your marketing or PR agency, consider how much you really know about your customers? If the answer is ‘not much’ spend the time and money to properly determine your target market (or least listen to your current PR agency if they advise this step and let them help you reach the right market).

Joseph Keller, Account Manager